Even here, Zupancic, like all previous psychologists and philosophers of humor, is completely unaware of the dynamic of psychological adjustment in social interaction that is the function of humor. Fragments of Attic Comedy J. Indeed, this irresistible motion is one of the key features of comedy, which is why it seems so difficult to pin down with concepts and definitions. Bernard Freydberg – – Philosophy Compass 5 7: It may come as little surprise to say that comedy is an extremely difficult subject of investigation — not only because if the multiplicity of various techniques and procedures involved in its process, but also because this process is in constant motion. And this is why we sometimes hang on to our pathologies even if they involve a lot of suffering. Recent Continental Philosophy and Comedy. Moral outrage is a particularly unproductive affect, yet it is one that offers considerable libidinal satisfaction.
It explains why it is that a surplus, collateral satisfaction appears when we satisfy our organic needs. It implies that a surplus satisfaction appears at the very site of the signifying minus, and that this satisfaction is at the same time something real not symbolic. Bernard Freydberg – – Philosophy Compass 5 7: Consider the failure to be oneself — another way of saying not to know oneself. To ask other readers questions about The Odd One In , please sign up. Moreover, comedy lives in the same world as its definitions in a much more emphatic sense than this could be said for other genres , and is quite capable of its own definitions as material to be submitted to further comic treatment, turned upside down, or inside out…. There is a limit.
So, with this text, a few glimpses of the delusion or petty delusion theme break out, unrealized and unexplained. University of Illinois Press, Moreover, comedy lives in the same world as its definitions in a much more emphatic sense than this could be said for other genresand is quite capable of its own definitions as material to be submitted to further comic treatment, turned upside down, or inside out….
You are commenting using your Twitter account. Luis Felip rated it it was amazing Sep 18, The question of comedy is a coherent, appropriate moment within Plato’s thought, linking the cardinal virtues with their lack in a comic character, just as in Aristophanes’ myth in the Symposium about the round-shaped humans who attack heaven.
This is not direct, it is not actual “comedy,” but humor. This would also involve naming — not only some people but also social and economic inequalities that we long stopped naming and questioning.
Such has been my training on that point. And this is why we sometimes hang on to our pathologies even if they involve a lot of suffering.
Notify me of new comments via email. If this is how repression works for speaking subjects, then my thesis, based on a certain reading of Freud and on some explicit statements of Lacan, is the following: In attacking the problem of the essence of humor, funniness or the comic at least in essence they are not distinctPlato makes clear reference to the same general theme of pretension that pervades his philosophy generally.
The more you feel, the more precious you are. Is the phenomenon of hysteria important to your project?
To ask other readers questions about The Odd One Inplease sign up. She says the comical fhe because human beings have something gratuitous about them, that they are more than what they appear to be or should be. How do we know it was not simply a case of temporarily forgetting the name? This is his first and most significant point, often overlooked.
It explains why it is that a alenkz, collateral satisfaction appears when we satisfy our organic needs.
The Odd One In: On Comedy
Seltman is a writer, psychotherapist, and psychoanalytic fellow at New York University. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Now for this to work, things must not really change.
Is this not tendentious? We could oje say: Here one can of course ask: Bram Van boxtel rated it really liked it May 09, My reading or rendering of this is as follows: The emergence of the signifying order directly coincides with the non-emergence of one signifier, and this fact — this original minus-one — leaves its trace in a particular disturbance of the signifying system — enjoyment or surplus satisfaction.
Alex zupacnic it did not like it Oct 04, It’s true that serious pretension, no matter how serious, can be toppled in a way that is comical or humorous, but only by suspending or cancelling out what is really believed about the serious character.
Real,subversive comedy thrives on the short circuits that establish an immediate connection betweenheterogeneous orders. She is the author of The Shortest Shadow: Thank you for signing up! In her early work, such as her book Ethics of the Real: Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Too Much of Not Enough: An Interview with Alenka Zupančič – Los Angeles Review of Books
This brings us back to what I said alenla. Before looking at her theory itself, note Zupancic’s attempt to distinguish humor and comedy already reflects the status quo error of humor and comic theory. The negativity that one encounters and traverses in analysis is supposed to affect not simply our knowledge about being, but our very being.
We are encouraged to behave as children: In other words, it is not enough to say that the signifier denaturalizes our needs because it implicates them into all kinds of symbolic relations and games. My claim is that the Freudo-Lacanian theory of sexuality, in its inherent relation to the unconscious, dislocates and transposes the philosophical question of ontology and its impasse in a most interesting way. Quotes from The Odd One In: Comedy by its nature isdifficult to pin down with concepts and definitions, but as artistic form and social practice comedyis a mode of tarrying with a foreign object–of including the exception.
Instead he wants his suffering to end while he himself remains in lovebecause his experience of the pleasure of love depends on this latter condition. Perhaps something will make us see how those who offer to protect us beyond a certain age, or some immediate emergencies, are our worst enemies — that they, and not some outside brutal villains, are the social agents of domination.
Not alone, but together with those who think in a similar way.